Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and User-Centered Design (UCD)

Abdulazeez Mousa

doi:10.66395/globeis.2

Authors

Abdulazeez Mousa Nawroz University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66395/globeis.2

Keywords:

Human-Computer Interaction, User-Centered Design, Usability Testing, System Usability Scale, Iterative Design

Abstract

Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is an interdisciplinary discipline in its core, which integrates knowledge of computer science, psychology, design, and engineering to comprehend and enhance how people interact with technology. Fundamentally, HCI does not consider the mechanics of interaction only, but also the quality of the experience, i.e., how intuitiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction the interaction is to the user. In this context, the concept of User-Centered Design (UCD) can be viewed as a philosophy and a systematic process where the end-users are central to any design and development decision that is made. UCD does not regard usability as an after-thought, but rather like systems, systems evolve in relation to actual human needs, situations and behaviours.
This paper examines the symbiotic connection between HCI concepts and UCD processes, and how the union of the two results in interactive systems that are not only workable, but also purposeful and non-discriminatory. It conducts a review of foundational theoretical models which provide an explanation of human cognition and interaction, compares more traditional methods of approaching UCD (waterfall based processes) with more modern methods of agile and lean, and provides quantitative evidence of the physical impact of UCD (in reduction of task completion time, error rates, and increased user satisfaction scores).
Finally, there is an objective to emphasize the need to incorporate strict HCI research into feasible UCD processes. In such a manner, organizations will be able to go beyond creating designs that are usable, and instead encourage innovation, trust and joy in the digital experiences organizations are producing. The integration itself is not merely beneficial in the era of fast technological development, it is a necessity to build the systems that empower users and the overall level of human-computer interaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Shneiderman, B. (2020). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (6th ed.). Pearson. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/25065.950626

2. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (2004). Human-computer interaction (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

3. Jacko, J. A. (Ed.). (2012). The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (3rd ed.). CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11963

https://doi.org/10.1201/b11963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11963

4. International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for

interactive systems. ISO. https://doi.org/10.3403/30388991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3403/30388991

5. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2015). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction (4th ed.). Wiley.

6. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203736166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203736166

7. Kieras, D. E., & Polson, P. G. (1985). An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(4), 365–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80045-6

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80045-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80045-6

8. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load theory and instructional design. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

9. Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books.

10. Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., & Norman, D. A. (1985). Direct manipulation interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 1(4), 311–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0104_2

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0104_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0104_2

11. Maguire, M. (2001). Context of use within a user-centred design approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(4), 517–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0486

https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0486

12. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/286498.286629

13. Cockburn, A. (2001). Writing effective use cases. Addison-Wesley Professional.

14. Snyder, C. (2003). Paper prototyping: The fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann.

15. Dumas, J. S., & Redish, J. C. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. Intellect.

16. Karvonen, M., & Ranta, M. (2005). Agile methods and user-centered design: A survey. In INTERACT 2005. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11555261_47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11555261_47

17. van Veen, J., & Peeters, M. M. (2015). Lean UX: The application of lean principles to user experience design. Journal of Usability Studies, 10(4), 162-171.

18. Bias, R. G., & Gillan, D. J. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests (3rd ed.). CRC Press.

19. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3

20. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. (2009). An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

24(5), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

21. IBM. (2015). The business value of design. IBM Design.

22. Cuddihy, P., & Glass, A. (2002). Design for voice user interfaces. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(4), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2002.1022330

23. Woods, D. D., Johannesen, L. J., Cook, R. I., & Sarter, N. B. (1994). Behind human error: Cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight. CSERIAC.

https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315568935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315568935

24. Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In CHI '91 Proceedings, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108856

25. Greenberg, S., & Buxton, B. (2008). The things we could do: A look at ubiquitous computing and the challenges for HCI. Morgan Kaufmann.

26. Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: Towards seamless integration of real and virtual worlds. In CHI '97 Proceedings, 234–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715

https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715

27. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

28. Zagal, J. P., & Tom, J. (2019). Dark patterns in games. In CHI PLAY '19 Proceedings, 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347192

29. Heylighen, A., & Clark, J. (2016). Inclusive design research: An overview. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(2), 177–187.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0406-y

30. Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.