Peer Review Policy

Peer Review Policy

GlobeIS International Journal of Global Information Systems (GlobeIS Journal) follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest standards of academic integrity and quality.

Review Process

• All submissions are initially screened by the editorial team for scope, originality, and compliance with author guidelines.
• Manuscripts passing the initial screening are sent to at least two independent expert reviewers for evaluation.
• Both the reviewers’ and authors’ identities are kept anonymous throughout the process (double-blind).
• Reviewers are asked to assess the manuscript’s originality, methodological rigor, clarity, ethical standards, and contribution to the field.
• Based on reviewer reports, the editor may decide to:
• Accept the submission
• Request minor or major revisions
• Reject the submissionThe journal does not guarantee acceptance and editorial decisions are final.

Review Timeline

• Authors are notified of the first editorial decision within 4–6 weeks of submission.
• Revised manuscripts may be re-evaluated by the same reviewers.
• The final decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.

Reviewer Responsibilities

• Provide constructive, unbiased, and timely feedback.
• Maintain strict confidentiality of the manuscript and review process.
• Disclose any conflicts of interest to the editorial office.